Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges & Protected Persons Defense Lawyer in Wisconsin

harged with Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges, or Other Protected Persons under Wis. Stat. § 940.62? These felony charges are aggressively prosecuted and can result in significant prison time, professional consequences, and long-term restrictions on your rights. Early legal representation is critical.

What the Law Says About Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges & Protected Persons

Under Wis. Stat. § 940.62, Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges, and Other Protected Persons occurs when a person intentionally causes bodily harm to another without consent, and the alleged victim is a member of a statutorily protected class acting in an official or job-related capacity.

The statute distinguishes between two felony levels based on the victim’s role and the circumstances of the alleged conduct:

Felony Level

Applies When

Examples of Protected Persons

Class I Felony – § 940.62(1)

Bodily harm caused with intent to influence or retaliate against public officers or specific government or education employees

Public officers, zoning/building inspectors, election officials, municipal or county employees, school-district and technical-college employees, or public-transit operators, drivers, or passengers

Class H Felony – § 940.62(2)

Bodily harm caused to justice-system, supervision, or regulatory officials or their families

Judges, prosecutors, law-enforcement officers, attorneys, witnesses or jurors (and their family members), probation or parole agents, DOR/DWD/DSPS employees, firefighters, commission wardens, and health-care providers or staff (and family members)

(Enacted and renumbered by 2025 Wisconsin Act 24; formerly scattered across §§ 940.20 and 940.203–.207.)

What the State Must Prove to Convict Under Wis. Stat. § 940.62

To secure a conviction for Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges, or Other Protected Persons, the State must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. The defendant caused bodily harm to another.
    • “Bodily harm” means physical pain, injury, illness, or impairment of physical condition.
  2. The act was done with intent to cause bodily harm.
  3. The act was done without the victim’s consent.
  4. The victim was a “protected person” as defined in § 940.62 (1) or (2).
  5. The defendant knew or had reason to know the victim’s protected status or that the act was done to influence or retaliate against the victim for performing official duties.

These elements are detailed in Wisconsin Jury Instruction – Criminal 1224 Battery to a Prosecutor or Law Enforcement Officer

Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges & Protected Persons Defense Lawyer in Wisconsin Free Consultations
REQUEST A FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION
New Website Intake

Penalties and Sentencing for Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges & Protected Persons

The penalties for Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges, or Other Protected Persons depend on the subsection charged and the status of the alleged victim. These offenses are classified as felony battery charges and carry mandatory collateral consequences in addition to potential prison exposure.

Offense

Classification

Maximum Imprisonment

Maximum Fine

Battery to public officers, election officials, college employees, and public transit workers – § 940.62(1)

Class I Felony

3 years 6 months

$10,000

Battery to individuals involved in the court system, law enforcement, probation and parol agents, and health care workers – § 940.62(2)

Class H Felony

6 years

$10,000

In addition to criminal penalties, courts may impose extended supervision conditions, probation restrictions, firearm prohibitions, and mandatory DNA submission. Sentence enhancers may apply under Wis. Stat. § 939.63 if a dangerous weapon was used.

Related Battery Offenses in Wisconsin

Battery to Law Enforcement, Judges, and Other Protected Persons is part of Wisconsin’s broader battery offense framework, which classifies charges based on injury severity, intent, and the status of the alleged victim. A full overview of how Wisconsin battery offenses are structured is available on our Wisconsin Battery Charges page.

  • Misdemeanor Battery – § 940.60(1)
  • Substantial Battery – § 940.60(2)
  • Aggravated Battery – § 940.60(3)
  • Battery by Prisoner or Person Subject to an Injunction – Wis. Stat. § 940.61

Defenses and Legal Strategies for Battery to Law Enforcement or Protected Persons

Defending against allegations under Wis. Stat. § 940.62 often requires challenging not only the alleged conduct, but also the State’s proof of intent, knowledge, and protected status. Effective defense strategies may include:

  • Mistaken identity or disputed contact — challenging whether contact actually occurred or constituted “bodily harm.”
  • Lack of knowledge — showing the defendant did not know (and had no reason to know) the victim’s protected status.
  • Self-defense or defense of others — establishing lawful use of force, especially where excessive force by officials occurred.
  • Intent dispute — arguing the act was reflexive, accidental, or lacked intent to injure.
  • Mitigation and negotiation — seeking reduction to Misdemeanor Battery when injury or status evidence is weak.

Why Hiring a Battery Defense Lawyer Matters

Battery charges involving law enforcement officers, judges, and other protected persons are among the most aggressively prosecuted violent offenses in Wisconsin. These cases often involve heightened scrutiny, institutional interests, body-worn camera footage, and credibility disputes that can significantly influence charging decisions and trial outcomes. Early involvement by experienced defense counsel is critical to protecting your rights and preventing unnecessary escalation of the case.

Local Experience matters. The attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. regularly defend clients charged with felony battery and violent crimes involving protected persons throughout Southern and Central Wisconsin, including Dane, Rock, Jefferson, Columbia, Dodge, Green, Iowa, and Sauk Counties.

Proven track record of results. Our firm has obtained dismissals, acquittals, and charge reductions in high-stakes violent-crime prosecutions by challenging intent, credibility, video evidence, and the State’s proof of protected status.

Recognized legal excellence. Attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. are recognized by Super Lawyers® and are active members of state and national criminal defense organizations, reflecting a commitment to serious trial advocacy and client-focused defense.


Battery to Protected Persons Result

  • Felony Battery to Health Care Worker – Dane County (February 2024)

    Result: Amended to Municipal Ordinance Violation
  • Battery to a Health Care Worker – Dane County (August 2022)

    Result: No Charges Filed

View more results from Chirafisi Anderson, S.C.


Contact Chirafisi Anderson, S.C.

Battery charges involving law enforcement officers, judges, or other protected persons carry severe legal and professional consequences. These cases demand an aggressive, detail-driven defense strategy that accounts for video evidence, credibility disputes, and the heightened scrutiny applied by prosecutors. An experienced defense attorney can intervene early to protect your rights and challenge the State’s case.

Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. represents individuals charged with felony battery and violent offenses throughout Southern and Central Wisconsin, including Dane, Rock, Iowa, Green, Columbia, Dodge, Jefferson, and Sauk Counties.

Frequently Asked Questions – Battery to Law Enforcement & Protected Persons

The statute applies when the victim is a public official, employee, or other protected person engaged in official duties, elevating a misdemeanor battery to a felony offense.

The classification depends on the victim’s occupation and the motive—retaliation or interference with official duties triggers Class H; others fall under Class I.

Yes. The prosecution must prove you knew or had reason to know of the person’s protected status or acted in retaliation for official duties.

Self-defense remains available if the force used was reasonable under the circumstances, even when the alleged victim was an officer or official.

Yes. Weak injury evidence, unclear intent, or lack of proof of protected-status knowledge can lead to dismissals or plea reductions to lower offenses.