Causing Mental Harm to a Child Lawyer in Wisconsin

Charged with causing mental harm to a child in Wisconsin? These allegations involve serious felony exposure and often rely on subjective interpretations of behavior and psychological impact. Contact our office today to schedule a free, confidential consultation.

(608) 250-3500

What the Law Says About Causing Mental Harm to a Child

Under Wis. Stat. § 948.04, causing mental harm to a child is charged when a person exercising temporary or permanent control over a child causes psychological harm through conduct that demonstrates substantial disregard for the child’s mental well-being. Unlike physical abuse cases, these allegations focus on emotional, psychological, or intellectual harm rather than visible injury.

Wisconsin law defines mental harm as substantial damage to a child’s psychological or intellectual functioning that may be shown through significant changes in behavior, emotional response, or cognitive functioning. These cases often rely on expert testimony, observations from third parties, and interpretations of a child’s behavior over time rather than direct physical evidence.

Causing mental harm allegations are frequently complex and highly subjective, involving disputed interpretations of parenting decisions, family dynamics, and behavioral development. At Chirafisi Anderson, S.C., we represent individuals facing child abuse and neglect charges like these by carefully analyzing whether the State can meet its burden under the statute and whether the evidence actually supports a finding of criminal conduct rather than lawful parental decision-making.

Key Points About Causing Mental Harm to a Child Charges in Wisconsin

Causing mental harm to a child is governed by Wis. Stat. § 948.04 and applies to alleged victims under the age of 18.
The offense focuses on psychological or emotional harm, not physical injury, and often involves subjective interpretations of behavior and development.
Mental harm is defined as substantial harm to psychological or intellectual functioning, demonstrated by significant and observable changes in behavior, emotions, or cognition.
Charges may be based on affirmative conduct or a failure to act by a person responsible for the child’s welfare.

What the State Must Prove to Convict on First Degree Sexual Assault in Wisconsin

To obtain a conviction for causing mental harm to a child under Wis. Stat. § 948.04, the State must prove each required element beyond a reasonable doubt, as set forth in Wisconsin Jury Instructions – Criminal 2116.

Under Wisconsin law, the State must prove the following:

The defendant was exercising temporary or permanent control over the alleged victim.
The alleged victim suffered mental harm, meaning substantial harm to psychological or intellectual functioning shown by significant and observable changes in behavior, emotional response, or cognition outside the normal range for the child’s age and development.
The defendant caused the mental harm, and the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in producing that harm.
The defendant caused the mental harm by conduct that demonstrated substantial disregard for the child’s mental well-being.
The alleged victim was under the age of 18 at the time the mental harm was caused.

If the State fails to prove any one of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must return a verdict of not guilty.

Causing Mental Harm to a Child Attorney in Wisconsin Free Consultations

REQUEST A FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION

Penalties and Potential Sentencing Exposure for Causing Mental Harm to a Child

Causing mental harm to a child is classified as a serious felony offense in Wisconsin. Although these cases do not involve physical injury, the statute treats psychological and emotional harm as significant due to the potential for long-term developmental consequences.

Alleged Conduct	Statutory Basis	Felony Class	Maximum Penalties*
Causing mental harm to a child by conduct demonstrating substantial disregard for the child’s mental well-being	§ 948.04(1)	Class F felony	Up to 12 years and 6 months imprisonment and up to $25,000 fine
Failure to act to prevent mental harm by a person responsible for the child’s welfare	§ 948.04(2)	Class F felony	Up to 12 years and 6 months imprisonment and up to $25,000 fine

*Maximum penalties reflect Wisconsin statutory maximums and do not account for sentencing enhancements, consecutive sentencing, or collateral consequences.

Common Scenarios Leading to Causing Mental Harm to a Child Charges

Allegations involving repeated verbal abuse, intimidation, or threats directed toward a child.
Claims arising from excessive punishment, isolation, or control that is alleged to have caused psychological distress
Reports made by teachers, counselors, or medical professionals observing significant behavioral or emotional changes in a child.
Situations involving high-conflict family dynamics, including contentious custody disputes or ongoing domestic tension.
Investigations stemming from CHIPS proceedings or referrals from child protective services to law enforcement.

Causing mental harm allegations often rely on interpretation rather than direct evidence, making the surrounding context and reliability of observations critical to understanding how and why charges were brought.

Defenses and Legal Strategies for Causing Mental Harm to a Child Charges

Causing mental harm to a child cases often involve highly subjective allegations and competing interpretations of parenting decisions, behavioral development, and psychological impact. An effective defense focuses on whether the evidence actually satisfies the statute’s demanding requirements and whether the State can prove criminal conduct rather than poor judgment or family conflict.

Failure to prove qualifying mental harm – The State must show substantial harm to the child’s psychological or intellectual functioning, supported by observable and significant changes beyond normal developmental variation.
Causation challenges – The prosecution must prove the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing the alleged mental harm, not merely one of several possible influences in the child’s environment.
Insufficient proof of substantial disregard – Not all difficult or controversial parenting decisions demonstrate substantial disregard for a child’s mental well-being as required by the statute.
Alternative explanations for behavioral changes – Stress from family conflict, school issues, medical conditions, or other life events may explain changes in a child’s behavior or emotional state.
Expert opinion disputes – These cases frequently rely on psychological or behavioral expert testimony, which may be challenged based on methodology, assumptions, or incomplete information.
Failure-to-act allegations – When charges are based on omission rather than affirmative conduct, the State must prove both knowledge of the harm and the realistic ability to prevent it.

Causing mental harm cases demand careful scrutiny of both the evidence and the inferences the State asks the jury to draw from it.

Why Hiring a Causing Mental Harm to a Child Defense Lawyer Matters

Causing mental harm to a child charges expose individuals to serious felony penalties and allegations that are often subjective and emotionally charged. These cases frequently depend on interpretations of behavior, expert opinions, and inferences about intent rather than clear physical evidence. Early legal representation is critical to ensure that the evidence is evaluated carefully and that the case is framed accurately from the outset. Decisions made early in the process can significantly affect both the criminal case and any related child welfare proceedings.

Established Criminal Defense Practice in Serious Felony Cases. The firm regularly represents individuals facing serious felony charges in Wisconsin courts, including cases involving allegations of harm to children. That experience brings a clear understanding of how these cases are charged, prosecuted, and evaluated at every stage of the process.

Depth of Experience With Child-Related Allegations. Mental harm allegations often arise in emotionally charged and highly scrutinized circumstances. The firm’s experience handling child-related criminal matters provides critical perspective on how prosecutors, judges, and agencies approach these cases and how allegations are assessed over time.

Familiarity With Wisconsin Courts and Related Proceedings. Cases involving alleged mental harm to a child frequently overlap with CHIPS matters and other child welfare proceedings. The firm’s familiarity with Wisconsin courts and the interaction between criminal and child-protection cases allows for consistent, informed representation across parallel processes.

View Criminal Case Results from the Attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C.

Talk to a Causing Mental Harm to a Child Defense Lawyer Today

A causing mental harm to a child charge carries serious felony exposure and can affect far more than the criminal case itself. If you are under investigation or have been charged, understanding your legal position early is critical. Contact our office today to schedule a free, confidential consultation and discuss your options.

(608) 250-3500 Schedule a Free Consultation

Frequently Asked Questions About Causing Mental Harm to a Child Charges in Wisconsin

Yes. Causing mental harm to a child under Wis. Stat. § 948.04 is classified as a Class F felony.

No. This offense focuses on psychological or emotional harm rather than physical injury. The State must prove substantial harm to a child’s psychological or intellectual functioning.

Mental harm involves substantial harm to psychological or intellectual functioning, often shown by significant and observable changes in behavior, emotional response, or cognition outside normal developmental ranges.

Yes. A person responsible for a child’s welfare may be charged if they knowingly failed to take action to prevent mental harm and that failure exposed the child to an unreasonable risk of harm.

Not always, but expert testimony is common. The State may rely on behavioral assessments, professional observations, and other evidence to support allegations of mental harm.