Manufacturing a Controlled Substance Charge in Wisconsin

Charged with manufacturing a controlled substance in Wisconsin? Manufacturing allegations often involve search warrants, lab evidence, and assumptions about intent that can dramatically increase felony exposure. Contact Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. for a free and confidential consultation.

What the Law Says About Drug Manufacturing in Wisconsin

Wisconsin law makes it a felony to manufacture a controlled substance unless authorized by law. Under Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1), “manufacture” is defined broadly and includes producing, preparing, compounding, converting, processing, packaging, or repackaging a controlled substance.

Importantly, the State does not need to prove that a finished drug was successfully produced. Manufacturing charges may be based entirely on acts taken toward production, possession of precursor materials, or alleged involvement in a production process. Prosecutors frequently rely on circumstantial evidence, expert opinions, and inferences drawn from seized equipment or chemicals.

At Chirafisi Anderson, S.C., our attorneys regularly represent individuals charged with drug manufacturing offenses across Southern and Central Wisconsin, including in Dane, Rock, Jefferson, Columbia, Sauk, Iowa, Dodge, and Green Counties. We understand how these cases are investigated, how prosecutors rely on lab evidence and expert assumptions, and where manufacturing allegations are most vulnerable to challenge. From search warrant review through expert cross-examination, we focus on protecting our clients’ rights and preventing overbroad or speculative manufacturing charges.

Key Points About Manufacturing Charges in Wisconsin

  • A completed controlled substance is not required for a manufacturing conviction.
  • Manufacturing includes a wide range of preparatory and production-related conduct.
  • Possession of equipment or precursors may be used to infer manufacturing intent.
  • Knowledge that the substance was controlled is required, but precise chemical knowledge is not.
  • Penalties escalate sharply based on substance type and attributed quantity.

What the State Must Prove to Convict on Manufacturing in Wisconsin

To convict someone of manufacturing a controlled substance, the State must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt, as set forth in Wisconsin Jury Instruction – Criminal 6021:

Under Wisconsin law, the State must prove the following:

  • Manufacturing Act: The defendant engaged in the act of manufacturing a substance.
    • Manufacturing includes producing, preparing, compounding, converting, processing, packaging, or repackaging a controlled substance.
  • Controlled Substance: The substance involved was a controlled substance whose manufacture is prohibited by law.
  • Knowledge or Belief: The defendant knew or believed that the substance was a controlled substance.
    • The State does not need to prove the defendant knew the precise chemical name, only that they knew the substance was illegal.

The State may rely on circumstantial evidence to establish knowledge, but it must be proven—not presumed.

Manufacturing a Controlled Substance Attorney in Wisconsin Free Consultations
REQUEST A FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION
New Website Intake

Penalties and Sentencing for Manufacturing Charges

Manufacturing a controlled substance is always a felony in Wisconsin. Penalties depend on the type of substance and the amount attributed to the manufacturing conduct under Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1). These penalties are the same and mirror the penalties for delivery of a controlled substance.

Manufacturing Cocaine Penalties

Amount Involved

Felony Classification

Penalty

≤ 1 gram

Class G Felony

Up to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 1 g – 5 g

Class F Felony

Up to 12.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 5 g – 15 g

Class E Felony

Up to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of $50,000

> 15 g – 40 g

Class D Felony

Up to 25 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

> 40 g

Class C Felony

Up to 40 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

Manufacturing Heroin Penalties

Amount Involved

Felony Classification

Penalty

≤ 3 gram

Class F Felony

Up to 12.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 3 g – 10 g

Class E Felony

Up to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of $50,000

> 10 g – 50 g

Class D Felony

Up to 25 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

> 50 g

Class C Felony

Up to 40 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

Manufacturing Fentanyl Penalties

Amount Involved

Felony Classification

Penalty

≤ 10 gram

Class E Felony

Up to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of $50,000

> 10 g – 50 g

Class D Felony

Up to 25 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

> 50 g

Class C Felony

Up to 40 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

Manufacturing Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, PCP and Similar Stimulants Penalties

Amount Involved

Felony Classification

Penalty

≤ 3 g

Class F Felony

Up to 12.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 3 g – 10 g

Class E Felony

Up to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of $50,000

> 10 g – 50 g

Class D Felony

Up to 25 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

> 50 g

Class C Felony

Up to 40 years imprisonment and a fine of $100,000

Manufacturing THC / Marijuana Penalties

Amount Involved

Felony Classification

Penalty

≤ 200 g or ≤ 4 plants

Class I Felony

Up to 3.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000

> 200 g – 1000 g or 5 – 20 plants

Class H Felony

Up to 6 years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000

> 1000 g – 2,500 g or 21 – 50 plants

Class G Felony

Up to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 2,500 g – 10,000 g or 51 – 200 plants

Class F Felony

Up to 12.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $25,000

> 10,000 g or > 200 plants

Class E Felony

Up to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of $50,000

Manufacturing Schedule IV and V Substances

Manufacturing a Schedule IV substance in any amount is a Class H felony punishable by up to 6 years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000.

Manufacturing a Schedule V substance in any amount is a Class I felony punishable by up to 3.5 years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000.

Sentencing Exposure and Judicial Considerations

In manufacturing cases, courts often focus on factors beyond weight alone, including:

  • Alleged scale or sophistication of the operation
  • Presence of lab equipment or chemical precursors
  • Location of alleged manufacturing activity (residential vs. commercial)
  • Expert testimony regarding production capability
  • Defendant’s role (principal actor vs. peripheral involvement)
  • Prior record and supervision status

Because manufacturing does not require a finished product, disputes over whether conduct actually constitutes manufacturing are central to many defenses.

Common Manufacturing Allegations in Wisconsin Drug Cases

  • Alleged methamphetamine or synthetic drug labs
  • Possession of precursor chemicals or equipment
  • Packaging or repackaging allegations
  • Incomplete or interrupted production processes
  • Shared residences or multi-occupant properties
  • Expert opinions inferring manufacturing capability

Defenses and Legal Strategies for Manufacturing Charges

Manufacturing cases often rest on assumptions rather than completed conduct. Effective defense strategies include:

  • No manufacturing act: Challenging whether conduct meets the statutory definition.
  • Mere possession of precursors: Arguing possession alone does not prove manufacturing.
  • No completed substance: Highlighting absence of finished drugs where relevant.
  • Knowledge disputes: Contesting awareness that substances were controlled.
  • Search and seizure challenges: Suppressing evidence from unlawful searches or warrants.
  • Expert testimony challenges: Attacking assumptions about production capability or yield.
  • Third-party responsibility: Disputing control over premises or equipment.

Early defense involvement is critical to preserve constitutional issues and prevent overcharging.


Why Hiring a Drug Manufacturing Defense Lawyer Matters

Manufacturing charges are among the most aggressively prosecuted drug offenses in Wisconsin and often carry severe felony exposure based on circumstantial evidence and expert assumptions. These cases require close scrutiny of search warrants, lab evidence, and the State’s theory of production. The attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. have the experience and proven results to protect your rights and challenge overbroad manufacturing allegations.

Local experience matters. We defend manufacturing cases across Southern and Central Wisconsin, including Dane, Rock, Jefferson, Columbia, Green, Iowa, Dodge, and Sauk Counties.

Proven results. Our attorneys regularly obtain dismissals and reductions by challenging search warrants, expert conclusions, and alleged manufacturing conduct.

Recognized excellence. Our attorneys are consistently honored by Super Lawyers® and are active members of leading criminal defense organizations statewide.


Contact Chirafisi Anderson, S.C.

If you are under investigation or charged with manufacturing a controlled substance, early legal representation can make a decisive difference. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions – Manufacturing a Controlled Substance in Wisconsin

No. Wisconsin law allows manufacturing charges based on acts toward production, even if no finished substance was produced.

Not by itself. The State must prove conduct that qualifies as manufacturing, not mere possession.

In some cases, yes—especially where evidence of manufacturing activity is weak or speculative.

No. The State must prove knowledge that the substance was controlled, not its precise chemical name.

Penalties are determined by the same statutory framework, but manufacturing cases often involve higher alleged quantities and enhanced exposure.