Wisconsin OWI Sentencing Guidelines

Understanding how Wisconsin judges determine OWI sentences – and how the attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. can protect your future. Give us a call or schedule your free consolation today.

How OWI Sentencing Works in Wisconsin

When a person is convicted of Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) in Wisconsin, the court must impose a sentence consistent with Wis. Stat. § 346.65 and the sentencing guidelines developed by each judicial district.

These guidelines outline recommended penalties based on the number of prior offenses, the blood alcohol concentration (BAC), and other aggravating or mitigating factors. They are not mandatory, but they strongly influence how judges determine jail time, fines, license revocation, and ignition-interlock requirements.

Each judicial district—and sometimes each county within it—has its own OWI sentencing grid. While statewide statutes set minimums, judges retain discretion to tailor the sentence to the facts of each case.

Learn more about our Wisconsin OWI defense practice.

Mandatory Penalties Under Wisconsin Law (§ 346.65)

Even though sentencing guidelines vary, every judge must apply at least these statewide minimums:

OWI Offense

Confinement Range

Fine Range

License Revocation

Ignition Interlock

1st Offense (civil)

None (unless minor/injury)

$150 – $300 + costs

6 – 9 months

≥ .15 BAC or refusal

2nd Offense

5 days – 6 months

$350 – $1,100 + costs

12 – 18 months

Mandatory (12 months +)

3rd Offense

45 days – 1 year

$600 – $2,000 + costs

2 – 3 years

Mandatory

4th Offense (felony)

60 days – 6 years

$600 – $10,000 + costs

2 – 3 years (lifetime revocation if previous offense within 15 years)

Mandatory

5th-6th Offense

18 months – 10 years prison

Up to $25,000

2 – 3 years (lifetime revocation if previous offense within 15 years)

Mandatory

7th-9th Offense

3 years – 12.5 years prison

Up to $25,000

2 – 3 years (lifetime revocation if previous offense within 15 years)

Mandatory

Note: Enhanced penalties apply for minors in the vehicle, injury or death, or high BAC (≥ 0.15).

See our pages on OWI with Minor Passenger, OWI Causing Injury, and OWI Homicide for details.

REQUEST A FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION
New Website Intake

Judicial District Sentencing Guidelines

Wisconsin’s 72 counties are divided into 9 judicial districts (there is no 6th judicial district), each with its own OWI guideline grid published by the Wisconsin Judicial Conference. The most current guidelines can be found below.

District

Counties Covered

Latest Guidelines (PDF)

1st

Milwaukee

As of 2018

2nd

Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth

As of 2023

3rd

Dodge, Jefferson, Ozaukee, Washington, and Waukesha

As of 2024

4th

Calumet, Fond du Lac, Green Lake, Manitowoc, Marquette, Sheboygan, Waushara, and Winnebago

As of 2025

5th

Columbia, Dane, Green, Lafayette, Rock, and Sauk

As of 2018

7th

Adams, Buffalo, Clark, Crawford, Grant, Iowa, Jackson, Juneau, La Crosse, Monroe, Pepin, Pierce, Richland, Trempealeau, and Vernon

As of 2024

8th

Brown, Door, Kewaunee, Marinette, Oconto, Outagamie, and Waupaca

As of 2024

9th

Florence, Forest, Langlade, Lincoln, Marathon, Menominee, Oneida, Portage, Price, Shawano, Taylor, Vilas, and Wood

As of 2024

10th

Ashland, Barron, Bayfield, Burnett, Chippewa, Douglas, Dunn, Eau Claire, Iron, Polk, Rusk, St. Croix, Sawyer, and Washburn

As of 2024

Although the guidelines are issued district-wide, each county applies them differently based on jail resources, treatment programs, and local culture.

Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Wisconsin judges weigh both aggravating and mitigating circumstances before imposing sentence.

Aggravating factors

  • High BAC (≥ 0.15 or 0.20)
  • Refusal to test
  • Causing injury, property damage, or an accident
  • Minor in the vehicle
  • Recent prior convictions/ poor driving record
  • Driving without a valid license or insurance

Mitigating factors

  • Clean driving/criminal record
  • Early voluntary AODA participation
  • Demonstrated sobriety or treatment progress
  • Cooperation with law enforcement
  • Employment stability and community support
  • Low BAC and minimal risk indicators

An experienced OWI defense attorney uses these factors to advocate for reduced jail, alternative sentencing, or treatment-based options.


District Attorney vs. Judicial Guidelines

Each District Attorney’s Office also maintains its own internal recommendations, which are often more severe than the court’s published judicial guidelines. A skilled OWI defense lawyer knows how to negotiate between the DA’s position and the judge’s discretion—and how to use district-level precedent to argue for the lowest possible sentence.

How Chirafisi Anderson Uses Sentencing Guidelines in Defense

At Chirafisi Anderson, S.C., we analyze both the judicial district guidelines and the local sentencing tendencies of each judge and prosecutor. Our attorneys have successfully represented clients in hundreds of OWI cases throughout Southern and Central Wisconsin including Dane, Rock, Jefferson, Dodge, Columbia, Sauk, Iowa, and Green Counties.

We help clients:

  • Anticipate realistic sentencing outcomes;
  • Build mitigation packages (treatment proof, character letters, employment documentation);
  • Secure alternatives such as Huber, electronic monitoring, or treatment court;
  • Challenge aggravating factors and negotiate charge reductions.

Get Help With Your OWI Case

Facing sentencing for an OWI in Wisconsin can be overwhelming. The attorneys at Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. understand how each county applies its guidelines—and how to argue for the best possible result.

Call Chirafisi Anderson, S.C. today for a free consultation with an experienced OWI defense lawyer. Serving clients across Southern and Central Wisconsin.

Frequently asked questions – Wisconsin OWI Sentencing

They are district-specific recommendations adopted by each judicial district to help judges decide appropriate sentences for OWI offenses. They are not binding but are widely followed.

No. Each judicial district has its own version, and individual counties apply them differently depending on available jail programs and court culture.

Yes. Effective advocacy, mitigation, and local familiarity often mean the difference between straight jail and Huber or electronic monitoring.

Yes. Many counties offer Huber work-release, treatment courts, community service, or electronic monitoring programs, depending on eligibility.

High BACs, minors in the vehicle, injury, or repeat offenses elevate penalties. The judge can double fines and revocation periods under § 346.65(2)(f).